Want to fight obesity? “Stop hating”
Daniel Engbar hits the nail on the head in his latest column for Slate: “Glutton Intolerance: What if a war on obesity only makes the problem worse?”
These data points suggest a rather simple approach to America’s obesity problem: Stop hating. If we weren’t such unrepentant body bigots, fat people might earn more money, stay in school, and receive better medical care in hospitals and doctor’s offices. All that would go a long way toward mitigating the health effects of excess weight—and its putative costs. But there’s an even better reason to think that America’s glutton intolerance is a threat to public health and the federal budget. Recent epidemiological research implies that the shame of being obese poses its own medical risk. Mental anguish harms the body; weight stigma can break your heart.
Engbar then delves into an interesting theory behind many of the so called obesity-related diseases. Victims of chronic stress or depression tend to maintain higher levels of inflammatory chemicals, or cytokines, in their bloodstream, which can increase one’s risk of heart disease, hypertension and diabetes. As it turns out, fat people often have unusually high cytokine levels, which as epidemiologist Peter Muennig argues, are caused by the stress and shame of being fat — the more abuse you take, the worst the disease. And the current anti-obesity rhetoric, Engbar says, only fans the social stigma flames.
…there’s plenty of evidence that body-shape discrimination plays a role in human disease outcomes. Shortness, for example, is associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease, diabetes, and early death—as well as lower wages and fewer long-term relationships. For some reason, though, the health effects of being short are worse for men than they are for women. Could it be that the social consequences of height and weight go in opposite directions?If anti-fat bias can affect our bodies, then it’s worth considering how an all-out war on obesity plays out in terms of public health. When we reach out to poor communities and educate them about the risks of being overweight, we are, in effect, exporting the weight stigma that happens to be most prevalent among rich, white people.
We’ve worked hard to frame excess weight as a major health risk and a drain on the economy. The motivation is generous enough: Anti-obesity rhetoric encourages people to eat less and exercise more. But what if it also encourages discrimination? If that’s the case, a war on obesity would come at a significant cost to the fattest Americans—in terms of lower wages, less education, and more stress-related illness.
Exactly.








posted on October 7th, 2009 at 7:52 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 8:46 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 9:34 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 9:55 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 10:31 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 10:40 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 11:37 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 11:57 am
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 6:29 pm
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
posted on October 7th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
posted on October 9th, 2009 at 12:11 am
posted on October 9th, 2009 at 12:12 am