Online test reveals: Are you fattist or thinnist?
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristoff discusses race and the presidential campaign in today’s op-ed column. He mentions a study conducted of Californian college students, many of whom support Obama, that found that the research subjects unconsciously perceived Obama as less American even than the former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Linked to are two different online implicit association tests that measure the way the unconscious mind works offered by Harvard and the University of Chicago for readers to test their own responses.
Harvard offers a variety of tests beyond race that measure responses to age, disability, gender and science, weapons and religion. Also offered is a test that reveals preferences for thin people relative to fat people. I took the test and little surprise, it revealed that I have a “slight automatic preference for Fat People compared to Thin People.” And even less shocking to fat folk everywhere, I am in the minority of test-takers. Of some 199,329 IAT scores recorded:

The test isn’t scientific proof, of course. It measures responses by rapidly flashing images and words, so responses may vary depending on a person’s reflexiveness and ability to follow directions. The website itself readily insists that the tests “are not perfectly accurate by any definition of accuracy.” But generally, the stronger an association one has with a particular subject, the more rapid-fire and accurate answers tend to be. One of the FAQ Harvard receives is from test-takers who are surprised to find that they exhibit a surprising preference they’d rather not have. In this case, Harvard researchers recommend:
One solution is to seek experiences that could undo or reverse the patterns of experience that could have created the unwanted preference. This could mean reading and seeing material that opposes the implicit preference. It could mean interacting with people that provide experiences that can counter your preference. A more practical alternative may be to remain alert to the existence of the undesired preference, recognizing that it may intrude in unwanted fashion into your judgments and actions. Additionally, you may decide to embark on consciously planned actions that can compensate for known unconscious preferences and beliefs. This may involve acts in ways that you may not naturally act – for example, smiling at people who are elderly if you know you have a implicit preference for the young. Identifying effective mechanisms for managing and changing unwanted automatic preferences is an active research question in psychological science. The good news is that automatic preferences, automatic as they are, are also malleable.
Good news, indeed. Did you take the test? How’d you score?








posted on October 30th, 2008 at 11:10 am
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 11:13 am
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 11:22 am
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 11:45 am
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 11:56 am
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 12:17 pm
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 4:46 pm
posted on October 30th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
posted on July 4th, 2009 at 3:44 am