Putting heads back on the headless fatties
Rachel Moss’ decision to photograph fat people and others and post their photos online with scathing commentary on them and their bodies has rightfully angered a lot of people. There have even been reports of people unrightfully threatening Moss’ academic standing, her job, and even her physical safety. What Moss did is wrong and inexcusable (as are the actions of those who have threatened her) even if she does suffer from an eating disorder and mental illness.
But I also have to ask: Is what Moss did so very different from what we see played out every day by mainstream media outlets?
Fat activist Charlotte Cooper first termed the phrase “Headless Fatty” in this fantastic editorial on the phenomenon of media publications taking and using covertly photographed images of beheaded fat people. That trend has now become unfortunately commonplace, with headless fattie photos splashed across newspapers, magazines and internet sites across the world. News organizations fall under the fair use doctrine of copyright laws; that is, they are permitted to use photos of people without their permission in the reporting of news. As one who works in the field, I honestly don’t feel that these organizations post these kinds of photos maliciously (or at least I hope not.) Most editorial powers-that-be simply do not have a grasp on the long-reaching backlash posting headless fattie photos has not only for fat people, but for a sizeist culture at large. Regardless, the end result is much the same as if they had. As Cooper explains:
As Headless Fatties, the body becomes symbolic: we are there but we have no voice, not even a mouth in a head, no brain, no thoughts or opinions. Instead we are reduced and dehumanised as symbols of cultural fear: the body, the belly, the arse, food. There’s a symbolism, too, in the way that the people in these photographs have been beheaded. It’s as though we have been punished for existing, our right to speak has been removed by a prurient gaze, our headless images accompany articles that assume a world without people like us would be a better world altogether.
I absolutely do not want to stifle the anger of those towards Moss, although I always encourage people to channel their anger in constructive and non-violent means. But instead of making Moss the lone target of our rage and frustrations, let’s refocus that anger on those media organizations that have normalized such behavior as tolerable and permissible. Simply put: Instead of attacking Rachel Moss, let’s attack those forces that have made Rachel Moss.
The process of reclaiming our heads begins with our mouths. When you see a headless fattie photo used, speak up. Write a letter to the editor. Complain to the company’s board of directors. Point it out and name the company on a blog. Let these companies know that this kind of behavior is insensitive, discriminatory and unacceptable. And don’t stop at headless fattie photos; insist that media outlets embrace body-size and ethnic diversity in its publications, too.
At the last Think Tank, COFRA members tossed around the idea of a “Putting the Heads Back on the Headless Fatties” kind of campaign as a way to reclaim both our heads and our dignity. One of the women targeted by Moss, a fat activist named Eileen, had the same idea. She posted her thoughts on Moss and the situation on her blog here, and included an awesome full-head photo of herself. Miriam Heddy, who also wrote a fabulous and insightful response on the debacle, did the same thing by posting her own photo.
In that same spirit, I’m posting a few of my own photos below, cerebrum intact, and I encourage everyone else - fat and thin - to either post a link to images of themselves in the comments below or post their own photos with attached heads on their own blogs. The process of reclaiming both our self-worth and dignity begins by combating the problem — head-on.
(The first photo self-taken this morning; the second sometime last year; and I got married one year ago July 25)











posted on May 30th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 4:50 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 4:55 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 5:02 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 5:18 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 5:57 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 6:35 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 6:52 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 9:39 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 10:50 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 11:00 pm
posted on May 30th, 2008 at 11:14 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 12:19 am
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 1:16 am
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 9:38 am
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 11:31 am
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 4:44 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 6:45 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 7:03 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 8:03 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 9:07 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 10:11 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 10:13 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 11:04 pm
posted on May 31st, 2008 at 11:25 pm
posted on June 1st, 2008 at 4:37 pm
posted on June 1st, 2008 at 7:27 pm
posted on June 2nd, 2008 at 12:59 pm
posted on June 2nd, 2008 at 4:09 pm
posted on June 28th, 2008 at 5:16 pm