Fitness for all, not just fat people
When I began making a concerted effort to deal with my gym phobia two months ago and become more active, my litmus was not weight loss or even inches lost. No, my goal was far less common: To run up the three and a half flights of stairs to my graduate class without huffing like a diesel truck.
Two months and hundreds of stairclimbing, cycling and walking miles later, I haven’t lost a single solitary pound, but I’m able to glide up the stairs effortlessly without getting winded. I kind of felt like Rocky after climbing the steps to the Philadelphia Art Museum.
An MSNBC story today addresses America’s “couch potato crisis,” but like most stories on fitness, it mindlessly conflates a lack thereof with obesity. Although the article notes that the average 2005 life expectancy is 78, up from 47 in 1900 and 68 in 1950, it continues to echo the as yet unsubstantiated claim that this generation may be the first to live shorter lives than their parents.
A story purportedly on Americans’ inactivity not so surprisingly quickly devolves into a scathing critique of obesity and obese people who, according to contributing writer Jacqueline Stenson, all eat Krispy Kremes, throw off their sneakers and kick back while their waistlines expand. I was surprised however, to see an actual dissenting opinion from someone other than NAAFA. Enter Samuel Preston, a professor of demography at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia:
“It’s extremely unlikely that today’s children will have shorter life expectancies than their parents. From everything I see, we continue to make rapid progress at extending life as a result of improvements in medical technology and personal health practices,” such as smoking less. Yes, we are fatter than we used to be but the implications of that have not been nearly as severe as has been popularly assumed.”
Preston acknowledges there is “some uncertainty” about the long-term impact of obesity on young kids. But, he says, “I haven’t seen a single convincing study that relates adult deaths to childhood obesity.” Side note: I have yet to see a death certificate with “obesity” listed as cause of death.
The article goes on to acknowledge that it is entirely possible to be fit and fat and such people may “possibly” be better off than thinner, sedentary people – as evidenced by this recent study. It also notes that smokers tend to be thinner than nonsmokers and that class differences also contribute to longevity. But the conversation quickly circles back to obesity as an indicator of inactivity.
I don’t deny that there exists a correlation between physical activity and body weight, but other than a fleeting reference, nowhere does the article address the health implications for sedentary, thin people. Such people seem to get a free pass to be inactive, while fat people are simply assumed to be inactive. And although such a correlation exists, it’s one fraught with immeasurable variables. Weight loss is not a simple matter of calories in/calories burned. As this NY Times article reveals, there are multiple factors that influence the effect of exercise on weight loss, none of which are conclusive or standard for all people. Physical activity may not make you thin, but it will make you healthier – regardless of your size.
The issue of what it is people are eating also isn’t addressed, besides the aforementioned stereotypical assumption that fat people eat Krispy Kreme. I don’t often evangelize about food here, even my ardent vegetarianism, because I feel an eating disorders blog ought not rank or judge food. But as my graduate research on food culture indicates, many of the diseases currently attributed to obesity and listed in detail in this article have actually arisen in tandem with the rise of processed foods, which are regularly consumed by people both fat and thin. For a good article on this, see here.
In short: Physical inactivity is detrimental to health – for people of all sizes. Suggesting only fat people are inactive is like suggesting only smokers get lung cancer or heart disease. It’s dangerously assumptive for those thin people who aren’t active and it’s insulting and offensive to those fat people who are. It also contributes to a hostile and toxic climate in which a majority of five-year-old girls would rather lose an arm than become the dreaded fat. We need to encourage all able-bodied people to incorporate physical activity in their lives and not just those people who are fat. After all, which is more important: Good health or the illusion of good health?
Click to Bookmark








posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 2:57 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 3:44 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 3:47 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 4:03 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 4:26 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 4:35 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 5:00 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 5:33 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 5:59 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 6:13 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 6:18 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 8:17 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 8:43 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 9:05 pm
posted on April 23rd, 2008 at 11:34 pm
posted on April 24th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
posted on April 24th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
posted on April 26th, 2008 at 3:12 am