More on the fat discrimination study
Time picked up on the recent Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity study in which it was revealed that weight discrimination is more prevalent than discrimination based on sexual orientation, nationality or ethnicity, physical disability and religious beliefs - article here.
“If a person perceives he is being discriminated against,” said study co-author Tatiana Andreyeva, “it might have significant consequences for his or her health and mental health. Even the perception of discrimination can be important because it is self-perpetuating.” And if rates of weight discrimination are indeed on the rise, say the authors, then it’s up to society to mandate legal protections for those who are overweight, just as laws protect people from discrimination by race, gender, disability and age.
As obesity continues to be demonized, all the while becoming more and more of a scapegoat for diseases, infirmities and disorders the medical community doesn’t want to admit it can’t quite fully comprehend or explain, Andreyeva’s suggestion is an astute one. Certainly if weight-based discrimination weren’t so prevalent, eating disorders wouldn’t be on the rise or as popular as they are today. And a study released earlier this year found that found that the desire to weigh less was a more accurate predictor of poor physical and mental health, than body mass index.
That fact that there still exists Americans today that need to have certain criteria legislated as a protected, legal class baffles me. And the fact that we even need to hold debates on the issue of granting and protecting civil rights astounds and saddens me.
Click to Bookmark







posted on April 13th, 2008 at 10:41 pm
posted on April 13th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
posted on April 16th, 2008 at 12:59 am
posted on April 21st, 2008 at 7:33 pm