She who orders the smallest salad ‘wins’
I admit it – I like to read the gossip scoops on MSNBC brimming with the latest Britney Spears debacle or rumor of an impending George Clooney marriage. But in reading about the recent lunch of pals Katie Holmes and Victoria Beckham, I have to wonder if sharing the details of their food choices – they shared a green salad sans dressing, one piece of fish, a side of steamed spinach and one regular Coke – is really all that fascinating to folks.
Then several days ago, several other bloggers and I were discussing this recent post on the blog Every Woman Has an Eating Disorder. The blog author instinctively knew a coworker was pregnant long before she told her. How? She noticed she had gained weight. Her male coworker, however, remained completely oblivious. Women are socially conditioned to *notice* these sorts of things… the slightest bit of weight gain, a new hairstyle, new outfit, etc… Women are not only cognizant of the bodies of others’, they also tend to scrutinize them more closely. It’s understandable why this phenomenon exists amongst women: When you’re groomed since birth to fit a specific cultural mold, you tend to unwittingly internalize it.
I’ve never had many “girl” friends – most of my friends have either been guys or women like me, who tend to buck feminine stereotypes. Maybe this is why I’ve never engaged in the kind of competitive ordering highlighted in this Allure article.
The article centers on a study conducted by Patricia Pliner, a psychology professor at the University of Toronto at Mississauga. In the study, test subjects read phony food diaries – some depicted women who ate small meals, while others were about women who ate larger meals. The small eaters were perceived to be more feminine, more concerned about appearance, and better-looking than the larger eaters.
Intrigued, Pliner next turned her attention to social dining rivalry amongst women. Her findings show that people tend to match their intake to that of whomever they’re eating with, and women in particular tend to eat the least when around other women. The exception to the rule is when people are dining with six or more close friends or family members – the assumption being that people feel comfortable and non-judged by those people around them.
Evidently, image control trumps hunger pangs, since yet another study showed that even after being deprived of food for more than 24 hours, people consumed only as much as a “minimally eating” friend, because external and social influences have more impact than the body’s internal signals to eat.
“Women are amazingly accurate at knowing how much other women around them eat,” says Patricia Pliner, a psychology professor at the University of Toronto at Mississauga. “Whether their friends polish off their plates has a powerful effect on what they eat.” This need to consume no less or no more than the next girl is almost visceral — and many who experience it would sooner admit to a cocaine habit than a competitive-eating one.
Not surprising, since eating in public tends to be as much an exercise in saving face as in saving waist. “Some women want to give the impression that they are ‘in charge’ of their diets or ‘in control’ of their eating,” says Susan Bowerman, assistant director of the Center for Human Nutrition at UCLA. (Admit it: How many blame-the-victim snap judgments have you made when you’ve spotted a heavy woman digging in to an ice-cream sundae at a restaurant?)
But a funny thing happens when people deny their hunger: You binge.
“When my clients restrict their food intake to appear strong in front of a dining partner, they often admit to raiding the kitchen later,” says Bowerman. Dollars to doughnuts, “they end up eating more calories than if they’d ordered what they really wanted.” As common as this might be, it’s detrimental nonetheless: “Even though some women think the two [eating styles] ‘balance’ one another, it’s a disorganized pattern of eating and isn’t likely to lead to long-term weight maintenance.”
Long-term weight maintenance? Who cares? Binging behaviors like this could lead to an eating disorder, which is far worse than an inability to maintain a size 8.
In explaining the why of competitive eating amongst women, Pliner discovered that women who are competitive about things unrelated to food often bring their issues to the table. In one of her studies, she paired up women to compete against each other in a variety of skills: the women who thought they were behind in the competition chose lighter entrees than their rivals at lunch.
“It was their way of controlling an area where they could succeed,” she says. “It was as if they were thinking, If I can’t compete with her in these other areas, at least I can eat healthier than she does.” Or, even more than that, be thinner.
I remember thinking almost the very same thing at the height of my eating disorder. My ability to abstain from food and to lose weight made me feel vastly superior to those mere mortals who gave into their bodies and ate. But you don’t have to have an eating disorder to feel similarly. Women are encouraged to compete with one another not in sports arenas or academics, but in a game of who’s more beautiful and who can best snag a man. She who loses the most wins the most.
The article also suggests other reason why a woman may deny her hunger:
But maybe the best — albeit a little arcane — anecdotal evidence of why women might be justified in not eating a lot when in a group setting is the idiomatic expression “old maid’s portion” — meaning that last slice of birthday cake, the final scoop of ice cream in the carton — suggesting that she who dares to help herself is damned to a life alone.
I’ve never heard the phrase “old maid’s portion,” but I have been at office parties and such where women will absolutely refuse to take the last cookie or piece of cake, all the while bemoaning how much they want to be “bad.” Inevitably, some male coworker sails along and grabs the offending piece while the women look wistfully on.
This kind of research isn’t new. Similar findings were found in a 1993 study in which subjects watched videos of the same average-weight woman eating one of four different meals. When the woman ate a small salad, she was judged most feminine; when she ate a big meatball sandwich, she was rated least attractive.
I think writer Rory Evans summed up the article nicely with her conclusion:
Spending time with friends over a shared meal is truly one of life’s most reliable pleasures. It should be a time to relax, not add more stress to your life — and certainly not a time to self-consciously scrape away béchamel sauce under the scrutinizing gaze of a competitive-eating friend. (Who needs enemies when you have dinner companions like that?) It’s entirely likely, too, that for all her gimlet-eyed glaring at everyone else’s plates, she’s really more worried about how people are viewing what she’s eating. And the only person affected by how much you eat is you.
Do you have any stories of competitive ordering? Do the food choices of your friends consciously or unconsciously affect what it is you order? Share your thoughts and experiences below.
Click to Bookmark







posted on April 7th, 2008 at 11:04 am
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 11:15 am
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 11:29 am
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 11:35 am
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:23 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:27 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:31 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:43 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:44 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 1:52 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 2:20 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 3:19 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 4:49 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 5:01 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 5:15 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 5:30 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 5:49 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 6:14 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 8:31 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 9:00 pm
posted on April 7th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 3:05 am
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 9:19 am
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 9:38 am
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 10:24 am
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 1:16 pm
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
posted on April 8th, 2008 at 11:11 pm
posted on April 9th, 2008 at 11:20 am
posted on April 9th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
posted on April 9th, 2008 at 5:57 pm
posted on April 9th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
posted on April 9th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
posted on April 10th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
posted on April 10th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
posted on April 12th, 2008 at 10:50 am
posted on April 17th, 2008 at 11:30 am
posted on April 18th, 2008 at 7:28 am
posted on April 18th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
posted on April 18th, 2008 at 11:40 pm
posted on May 17th, 2008 at 4:10 am
posted on May 17th, 2008 at 8:11 am
posted on May 17th, 2008 at 1:02 pm