<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A House Divided&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:22:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24291</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24291</guid>
		<description>(A late thanks for the Think Tank plug, Rachel!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(A late thanks for the Think Tank plug, Rachel!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annaham</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24160</link>
		<dc:creator>annaham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24160</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;Constant pain, or cold, or nausea, is the kind of thing that’s invisible to others and doesn’t make for a very good story. We want tangible details to help us understand someone else’s suffering. But what makes suffering suffering is not the details that only emerge now and again — it’s the simple, relentless, maddening pain in the background that never goes away. That’s what people who haven’t been there really can’t imagine.&lt;/I&gt;

I agree completely, Kate. I&#039;ve been following this whole thing with great interest, and what consistently amazes me--whether it&#039;s with trolls, people who claim to speak for &quot;the whole movement&quot; [which, of course, happens frequently, and not only within the FA movement, as we know] or with Kell&#039;s post--is a stunning lack of basic human empathy. I&#039;m not overweight/fat, but I do have a disability that would be considered by many to be &quot;invisible.&quot; What disturbed me so much about Kell&#039;s post was her apparent unwillingness to see Heidi&#039;s circumstances as &lt;I&gt;human&lt;/I&gt; circumstances, and she therefore felt entitled enough to decide what behaviors, choices and experiences are &quot;acceptable&quot; within the FA movement, and which are not. It saddens me that some people still have such incredibly self-centered attitudes, even within a movement that, somewhat ironically, is so focused upon improving the quality of life for all of those within it, and not just those who fit into a very specific or narrow set of criteria. 

A philosopher (whose name escapes me at the moment) commented some years ago that it is nearly impossible for those who have never experienced severe health problems or disability (ies) to even &lt;I&gt;conceptualize&lt;/I&gt; what life with such a condition would be like. The more I witness the aforementioned lack of empathy--both within certain sectors of the blogosphere and in real life (even in my daily life)--the more I am, unfortunately, inclined to agree with this hypothesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Constant pain, or cold, or nausea, is the kind of thing that’s invisible to others and doesn’t make for a very good story. We want tangible details to help us understand someone else’s suffering. But what makes suffering suffering is not the details that only emerge now and again — it’s the simple, relentless, maddening pain in the background that never goes away. That’s what people who haven’t been there really can’t imagine.</i></p>
<p>I agree completely, Kate. I&#8217;ve been following this whole thing with great interest, and what consistently amazes me&#8211;whether it&#8217;s with trolls, people who claim to speak for &#8220;the whole movement&#8221; [which, of course, happens frequently, and not only within the FA movement, as we know] or with Kell&#8217;s post&#8211;is a stunning lack of basic human empathy. I&#8217;m not overweight/fat, but I do have a disability that would be considered by many to be &#8220;invisible.&#8221; What disturbed me so much about Kell&#8217;s post was her apparent unwillingness to see Heidi&#8217;s circumstances as <i>human</i> circumstances, and she therefore felt entitled enough to decide what behaviors, choices and experiences are &#8220;acceptable&#8221; within the FA movement, and which are not. It saddens me that some people still have such incredibly self-centered attitudes, even within a movement that, somewhat ironically, is so focused upon improving the quality of life for all of those within it, and not just those who fit into a very specific or narrow set of criteria. </p>
<p>A philosopher (whose name escapes me at the moment) commented some years ago that it is nearly impossible for those who have never experienced severe health problems or disability (ies) to even <i>conceptualize</i> what life with such a condition would be like. The more I witness the aforementioned lack of empathy&#8211;both within certain sectors of the blogosphere and in real life (even in my daily life)&#8211;the more I am, unfortunately, inclined to agree with this hypothesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamW</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24104</link>
		<dc:creator>WilliamW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24104</guid>
		<description>Hi Meowser 

Also when people in these situations come to Fat Acceptance asking for support they do not need to be attacked!!

What better way is there to push them away from Fat Acceptance and leave them with only the Doctors to listen to.

To change people&#039;s ideas and behavior takes two way communication and can never be accomplished in angry responses to the newcomer. You have to listen to them and respond.

I know from Ads that I have heard on the radio that WLS Doctors know how to market themselves and their Websites are very nice to the prospective WLS patients visiting there.

William</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Meowser </p>
<p>Also when people in these situations come to Fat Acceptance asking for support they do not need to be attacked!!</p>
<p>What better way is there to push them away from Fat Acceptance and leave them with only the Doctors to listen to.</p>
<p>To change people&#8217;s ideas and behavior takes two way communication and can never be accomplished in angry responses to the newcomer. You have to listen to them and respond.</p>
<p>I know from Ads that I have heard on the radio that WLS Doctors know how to market themselves and their Websites are very nice to the prospective WLS patients visiting there.</p>
<p>William</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fillyjonk</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24101</link>
		<dc:creator>Fillyjonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24101</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;People like this absolutely need to be given more choices besides, “Hand over your stomach and then we’ll talk.”&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, bravo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>People like this absolutely need to be given more choices besides, “Hand over your stomach and then we’ll talk.”</i></p>
<p>Oh, bravo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meowser</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24057</link>
		<dc:creator>Meowser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 05:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24057</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;That being said, not everyone really is healthy at every size. I wasn’t. My highest weight was reached through spectacularly destructive eating and extreme lack of physical activity.&lt;/em&gt;

HAES does not mean &quot;accept having a binge eating disorder and serious depression, and don&#039;t do anything about it, because if you do you might lose weight and screw you sideways with a phone book if you do.&quot;  What it means is that we don&#039;t auto-assume that a person is in poor health solely because of their weight.  We also don&#039;t auto-assume that every person who is fat is so because they are &quot;lazy gluttons,&quot; as there are also plenty of &quot;lazy gluttons&quot; out there who are thinner.   And it means that health issues -- both mental and physical -- are treated as they would be for a thinner person with the same problem, not with &quot;lose weight and then maybe we&#039;ll treat you.&quot;

It&#039;s all too easy to say to someone who&#039;s suffering, &quot;Your doctor is a rusty tool, go find another doctor who can see past your fat.&quot;  The fatter you are, the more remote a chance there is of that happening, especially if you don&#039;t live in an &quot;enlightened&quot; San Francisco-esque city and have no way to get there for any kind of extended treatment.  Stories like Heidi&#039;s and Vesta&#039;s are important to get out there because they point that out.  People like this absolutely need to be given more choices besides, &quot;Hand over your stomach and then we&#039;ll talk.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>That being said, not everyone really is healthy at every size. I wasn’t. My highest weight was reached through spectacularly destructive eating and extreme lack of physical activity.</em></p>
<p>HAES does not mean &#8220;accept having a binge eating disorder and serious depression, and don&#8217;t do anything about it, because if you do you might lose weight and screw you sideways with a phone book if you do.&#8221;  What it means is that we don&#8217;t auto-assume that a person is in poor health solely because of their weight.  We also don&#8217;t auto-assume that every person who is fat is so because they are &#8220;lazy gluttons,&#8221; as there are also plenty of &#8220;lazy gluttons&#8221; out there who are thinner.   And it means that health issues &#8212; both mental and physical &#8212; are treated as they would be for a thinner person with the same problem, not with &#8220;lose weight and then maybe we&#8217;ll treat you.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all too easy to say to someone who&#8217;s suffering, &#8220;Your doctor is a rusty tool, go find another doctor who can see past your fat.&#8221;  The fatter you are, the more remote a chance there is of that happening, especially if you don&#8217;t live in an &#8220;enlightened&#8221; San Francisco-esque city and have no way to get there for any kind of extended treatment.  Stories like Heidi&#8217;s and Vesta&#8217;s are important to get out there because they point that out.  People like this absolutely need to be given more choices besides, &#8220;Hand over your stomach and then we&#8217;ll talk.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorn</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24055</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24055</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Although, honestly, there’s a also a part of me that doesn’t want to discuss the particulars of Heidi’s situation at all. Only because the relevant part to me isn’t whether she really needed it or whether or not it’ll really help her, it’s about where modern medicine fails to help fat people. And a society that sees rapid weight loss as admirable and rapid weight gain as disgusting instead of seeing them both as evidence of imbalance and illness (including mental illness.) At this point FA advocates worrying about an individual’s decision to have WLS or engage in WLD is completely and utterly misdirected, imo. When really fat people have options that aren’t all completely sucktastic, then I care about whether or not people engage in these behaviors.&lt;/i&gt;

*applause*

attrice, I agree with this 100%. Discussing the particulars of Heidi&#039;s situation is, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://red3.blogspot.com/2007/10/institutional-memory.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Brian&lt;/a&gt; also describes Kell&#039;s post, &quot;a distraction.&quot;

I believe that absolutely is the case. It&#039;s not about whether or not Heidi&#039;s situation does or does not &quot;really&quot; warrant WLS. It&#039;s about the fact that a woman in constant pain, a woman who is becoming increasingly trapped by her own body, a woman whose symptoms indicate something is clearly going on with her that is going unaddressed, is having all of her other health care options essentially withheld from her until she consents to WLS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Although, honestly, there’s a also a part of me that doesn’t want to discuss the particulars of Heidi’s situation at all. Only because the relevant part to me isn’t whether she really needed it or whether or not it’ll really help her, it’s about where modern medicine fails to help fat people. And a society that sees rapid weight loss as admirable and rapid weight gain as disgusting instead of seeing them both as evidence of imbalance and illness (including mental illness.) At this point FA advocates worrying about an individual’s decision to have WLS or engage in WLD is completely and utterly misdirected, imo. When really fat people have options that aren’t all completely sucktastic, then I care about whether or not people engage in these behaviors.</i></p>
<p>*applause*</p>
<p>attrice, I agree with this 100%. Discussing the particulars of Heidi&#8217;s situation is, as <a href="http://red3.blogspot.com/2007/10/institutional-memory.html" rel="nofollow">Brian</a> also describes Kell&#8217;s post, &#8220;a distraction.&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe that absolutely is the case. It&#8217;s not about whether or not Heidi&#8217;s situation does or does not &#8220;really&#8221; warrant WLS. It&#8217;s about the fact that a woman in constant pain, a woman who is becoming increasingly trapped by her own body, a woman whose symptoms indicate something is clearly going on with her that is going unaddressed, is having all of her other health care options essentially withheld from her until she consents to WLS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devi</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24047</link>
		<dc:creator>Devi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24047</guid>
		<description>I think it’s understandable to want to focus on people who living very healthy lives within the FA community. Show healthy, active fat people, and you have a slightly better chance of counteracting the media hysteria. 

That being said, not everyone really is healthy at every size. I wasn’t. My highest weight was reached through spectacularly destructive eating and extreme lack of physical activity. 

Looking at me now, do I seem like someone who is healthy and overweight? Probably. I eat well, I exercise regularly, and I easily outpace women half my size at the gym. But it’s not the whole picture. 

Does the fact that I &lt;i&gt;wasn’t&lt;/i&gt; healthy mean I was less deserving of acceptance? I don’t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s understandable to want to focus on people who living very healthy lives within the FA community. Show healthy, active fat people, and you have a slightly better chance of counteracting the media hysteria. </p>
<p>That being said, not everyone really is healthy at every size. I wasn’t. My highest weight was reached through spectacularly destructive eating and extreme lack of physical activity. </p>
<p>Looking at me now, do I seem like someone who is healthy and overweight? Probably. I eat well, I exercise regularly, and I easily outpace women half my size at the gym. But it’s not the whole picture. </p>
<p>Does the fact that I <i>wasn’t</i> healthy mean I was less deserving of acceptance? I don’t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deniselle</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24031</link>
		<dc:creator>Deniselle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24031</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m trying to understand where Kell is coming from with such a strong opposition to Heidi (in her earlier posts, she was working to refute Heidi&#039;s idea that she&#039;s fat because of her eating habits, for instance). But I know Kell&#039;s not here to answer it herself, and it might not be the right place and time to ask these questions. Nevermind. 

What I do see in the FA community is that, like Kate said, there tends to be an emphasis on physically active, healthy-eating people. Maybe us not quite as healthy-living ones should be a bit more verbal about our lifestyles too. The thing is, it easily feels like something to be ashamed of or hide, at least keep away from the blog. Just so the haters don&#039;t see it and think &quot;Typical fat person, living on burgers and candy, I knew it!&quot; What Heidi&#039;s blog made me realize is that the relative healthiness of the writer has no real impact on the strength of the message - it&#039;s all about how personal, genuine and well written the blog is. Maybe this is going back to the issue of public versus personal, but it&#039;s 4 am here, so I can&#039;t bring myself to make a real point anymore. More tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m trying to understand where Kell is coming from with such a strong opposition to Heidi (in her earlier posts, she was working to refute Heidi&#8217;s idea that she&#8217;s fat because of her eating habits, for instance). But I know Kell&#8217;s not here to answer it herself, and it might not be the right place and time to ask these questions. Nevermind. </p>
<p>What I do see in the FA community is that, like Kate said, there tends to be an emphasis on physically active, healthy-eating people. Maybe us not quite as healthy-living ones should be a bit more verbal about our lifestyles too. The thing is, it easily feels like something to be ashamed of or hide, at least keep away from the blog. Just so the haters don&#8217;t see it and think &#8220;Typical fat person, living on burgers and candy, I knew it!&#8221; What Heidi&#8217;s blog made me realize is that the relative healthiness of the writer has no real impact on the strength of the message &#8211; it&#8217;s all about how personal, genuine and well written the blog is. Maybe this is going back to the issue of public versus personal, but it&#8217;s 4 am here, so I can&#8217;t bring myself to make a real point anymore. More tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24030</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24030</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting thought, Deniselle, but unless she comes back (and feels like talking about it), all we can do is guess. It&#039;s something along the lines of which we should be asking our own selves - are we bothered at all by people who are quite large and/or people who are both fat and unhealthy? If so, why? If we&#039;re bothered by both, which one provokes a stronger reaction? Why? If we&#039;re bothered by any of the above, what sort of issues do we need to address within ourselves? What is the cause of the reaction(s)?

Asking these things about someone who isn&#039;t here to answer the question herself... strikes me as either futile or slightly underhanded. Either way, not productive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting thought, Deniselle, but unless she comes back (and feels like talking about it), all we can do is guess. It&#8217;s something along the lines of which we should be asking our own selves &#8211; are we bothered at all by people who are quite large and/or people who are both fat and unhealthy? If so, why? If we&#8217;re bothered by both, which one provokes a stronger reaction? Why? If we&#8217;re bothered by any of the above, what sort of issues do we need to address within ourselves? What is the cause of the reaction(s)?</p>
<p>Asking these things about someone who isn&#8217;t here to answer the question herself&#8230; strikes me as either futile or slightly underhanded. Either way, not productive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deniselle</title>
		<link>http://the-f-word.org/blog/index.php/2007/10/26/a-house-divided/comment-page-1/#comment-24027</link>
		<dc:creator>Deniselle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-f-word.org/blog/?p=211#comment-24027</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to ask those who have been around longer than me and discussed things with Kell more - do you think Kell might be more partial to a &quot;healthy fat person&quot; or &quot;strong 300-pound woman&quot; image than someone who&#039;s genuinely suffering from weight-related health problems? She did make some rather frustrated posts about how she&#039;d like to focus on the majority of fat people, not on the ones who have extreme health problems. Which personally I&#039;m OK with, as long as the biggest people also have a voice in the movement at large. 

I guess what I&#039;m asking is - with the same disease history and the same pain, but no plans to have WLS, would Heidi still have been a red flag to Kell? Was she, in reality, opposed to Heidi&#039;s public suffering and the possibility that the readers who aren&#039;t fat might assume this is the reality of obesity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to ask those who have been around longer than me and discussed things with Kell more &#8211; do you think Kell might be more partial to a &#8220;healthy fat person&#8221; or &#8220;strong 300-pound woman&#8221; image than someone who&#8217;s genuinely suffering from weight-related health problems? She did make some rather frustrated posts about how she&#8217;d like to focus on the majority of fat people, not on the ones who have extreme health problems. Which personally I&#8217;m OK with, as long as the biggest people also have a voice in the movement at large. </p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m asking is &#8211; with the same disease history and the same pain, but no plans to have WLS, would Heidi still have been a red flag to Kell? Was she, in reality, opposed to Heidi&#8217;s public suffering and the possibility that the readers who aren&#8217;t fat might assume this is the reality of obesity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
